Updated · July 2026

Claude vs Codex

The two frontier closed-model subscriptions. Claude Code leads marginally on benchmark (Opus 4.7 at 80.8% SWE-Bench) but Pro usage is very limited. ChatGPT Codex (GPT-5.5, released April 23, 2026) has much more generous limits at the same $20/mo and a cheaper $8/mo Go entry tier.

ClaudeCodex
CategoryLLM PlanLLM Plan
Entry price$20/mo$8/mo
Model typeclosedclosed
SWE-Bench80.8%80.0%
Output speed30 TPS40 TPS
ArchitectureDenseDense
Paid tiers34
Tiers
Pro$20/mo· ~44K tokens/5h - Claude Opus 4.7 & Sonnet 4.6 - adaptive thinking
Max 5x$100/mo· 5x Pro usage - priority access - Claude Code - Claude Design
Max 20x$200/mo· ~220K tokens/5h - ~93% savings vs API - task budgets
Go$8/mo· More messages than free - ad-supported (US)
Plus$20/mo· GPT-5.5 - 10 Deep Research runs - Sora
Pro$100/mo· 5x Plus usage - Fast mode - GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark preview
Pro Ultra$200/mo· 20x usage - 250 Deep Research - 1M token context - 400K context

Which wins for...

Cheapest entryCodex

ChatGPT Go is $8/mo (ad-supported, US). Claude's cheapest paid tier is Pro at $20/mo.

Most usage at $20/moCodex

ChatGPT Plus has more generous limits than Claude Pro, whose usage is currently very tight.

Best coding benchmarkClaude

Claude Opus 4.7 scores 80.8% on SWE-Bench vs GPT-5.5 at 80.0% - a marginal lead on the hardest tasks.

Backend / agent tasksCodex

The Codex agent is appreciated for backend work and keeps improving; Claude Code is strong too but Pro limits bite faster.

Verdict

At the same $20/mo, ChatGPT Plus gives more generous limits and a cheaper $8 entry. Pick Claude only if you specifically prefer Opus for complex refactors or want Claude Design.

New models & deals, once a month

New proprietary and open-source models worth trying, price drops, and the best deals on AI coding plans. No spam.

Sources: official sites · r/ClaudeAI · r/LocalLLaMA · r/ZaiGLM · r/ChatGPT. Plans and features may vary - check official sites for the latest.